Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brain Candy Blueprint's avatar

Thanks for your insight. Of course it’s also about bio individuality and people being their own health care advocates. But we’ve definitely been brainwashed to believe what puts money in the food industries pocket. And I use the term “food” loosely.

Expand full comment
Paul Bunning's avatar

I am intrigued by your defining a low-carb diet as consuming less than 50 grams per day. Surely for someone who is physically active, muscular, having a relatively fast metabolism, and large frame will find a diet limited to 50 gm of carbs a very different experience than a less active, slimmer, more petite person. Because these two people will have different basal calorie needs. In contrast, I have seen low-carb diets defined as 25% of daily calories from carbs, which accommodates for those two different body types.

For example, someone who consumes 1500 calories per day would find themselves eating 13% of their calories in carbs at the 50 gm level, whereas someone eating 2500 calories per day would be limited to 8% from their carbs with the same 50 restriction.

I am not saying either definition is better than the other --I guess that's your job! But I would appreciate your take on this quandary...

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts