7 Comments
User's avatar
Jim the Geek's avatar

Like you, I once considered getting a CGM. The cost of the device and app subscription was a bit much for a pensioner. Fortunately I've gotten pretty good at rationing carbs. When I do ingest a lot of them, I try to also include a good portion of protein, on the theory that digesting the protein will slow the glucose being dumped into the bloodstream. Regarding coffee, every morning starts with a generous cup, infused with grass-fed collagen and a bit of heavy cream.

Expand full comment
Maria Cross's avatar

Sounds like you don’t need a CGM. I do occasionally test my blood sugar with a finger-prick test. I think that’s quite enough, as I don’t want to obsess about it. Fat and protein do the job nicely.

Expand full comment
Alec McQueen's avatar

Maria, very disappointed in the coffee study… I am a great coffee drinker, and it has been proven that most epidemiological studies are wrong…. Therefore, coffee is bad for you. Damn!

Expand full comment
Maria Cross's avatar

Don't worry, soon enough there will be another epidemiology study to tell us that coffee is bad for the heart!

Expand full comment
Christine Wagner's avatar

Very surprising results from that study on cgms. I've had one for about a year and a half and found it to be quite reliable. My use of the fingerprint devices, way unreliable. There need to be more studies on cgms. Stress, exercise all impact blood sugar, not just food eaten. .

Expand full comment
Maria Cross's avatar

Yes the whole blood sugar thing is probably more complex than anyone realises. Rather like the gut microbiome. I think what we know is much less than what we still need to know.

Expand full comment
Tim Ebl 🇨🇦's avatar

I read about CGMs and decided I didn’t need one. To find out they may not be accurate anyway confirms my lack of need. I follow the saw method as Jim the Geek and prioritize that protein.

Expand full comment